EEOC Says BMW Dealer Discriminated Against Older Workers
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission says BMW Cleveland violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act when it terminated two older salesmen and failed to rehire a former service manager.

EEOC officials say an Ohio BMW dealership violated federal law in its handling of three older workers.
Photo by RoadOver via Flickr
CLEVELAND — Davis Automotive Group Inc. violated federal law by intentionally subjecting older workers at BMW Cleveland to age discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charged in a lawsuit filed last week in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio’s Eastern Division.
According to the suit, the Solon, Ohio, dealership discriminated against a former employee by refusing to rehire her because of her age (52) and for terminating two sales employees because of their ages (67 and 70).
Read: EEOC Sues Okla. Dealer for Refusing to Hire Female Salesperson
As a result of these practices, officials say, the company violated the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act, which prohibits age discrimination in employment against people age 40 or older, according to the lawsuit.
The charging documents note the EEOC attempted to reach a settlement before moving forward with the lawsuit, which seeks monetary relief, including back pay and liquidated damages, for the three former employees.
“Failing to employ and discharging qualified people because of their age is not only unfair, it is against the law.”
The suit also seeks injunctive relief to prevent future age discrimination, including an order to institute policies, practices, and procedures that conform to the requirements of federal law.
“Failing to employ and discharging qualified people because of their age is not only unfair, it is against the law,” said Debra Lawrence, regional attorney for EEOC’s Philadelphia District Office. “We will continue to combat these abhorrent employment practices that violate federal law as well as common justice.”
More Compliance

Dealer Ads and the FTC
The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.
Read More →
AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge
The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.
Read More →
The Jurisprudence of Pricing
Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities
The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.
Read More →
June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month
Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.
Read More →
Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide
New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.
Read More →
Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive
Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.
Read More →
CARS Rule Update: 5th Circuit Oral Arguments Recap
In this video, Jim Ganther of Mosaic Compliance Services, recaps the key takeaways from the oral arguments in the critical CARS Rule case, including potential outcomes and what dealers should do to stay ahead of compliance changes.
Read More →
State of the CARS Rule, Part 3
The players in the automotive industry should coordinate their responses to this pending regulation.
Read More →
The Future of Car Dealer Documents
Where forms, documents, agreements and contracts could be in 50 years.
Read More →