J.D. Power: Differing Approaches to Digital Financing Creates Wide Satisfaction Gap
While the digital application channel generated significantly higher levels of overall satisfaction in J.D. Power’s 2017 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction Study, many consumers are waiting longer for a credit decision than those utilizing dealer representatives.
COSTA MESA, Calif. — Digital auto loan applications can lead to improved customer satisfaction, but wide variance in the execution of the digital application process has created a significant performance gap between top and bottom performing finance sources, according to the J.D. Power 2017 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction Study.
The top-performing mass market and luxury finance sources rate significantly higher than the lowest performers (8.75 vs. 7.93 and 8.85 vs. 7.54, respectively, on a 10-point scale) in the most heavily weighted website attribute in the study: range of services that can be performed online.
“With such erratic approaches to digitalization, many auto lenders are failing to successfully capitalize on tremendous cost-cutting opportunities that have proven to boost customer satisfaction,” said Jim Houston, senior director of automotive finance at J.D. Power. “With some lenders varying widely on ease-of-use satisfaction scores for their digital offerings, a huge opportunity is going unmet by many.”
While the digital application channel generates significantly higher levels of overall satisfaction among both mass market and luxury customers, many are waiting longer for a credit decision than those utilizing dealer representatives. According to the study, just 30% of customers applying online received a credit decision within 15 minutes vs. 46% who filled out a paper application with a dealer.
The study also found that time given to make first payment provided the greatest impact on the onboarding experience. High-ranking mass market and luxury finance sources, for instance, performed highest on time given to make first payment, allowing an average lead time of 21.2 days for mass market customers and 18.4 days for luxury customers prior to first payment due date.
Driving the highest customer satisfaction were autopay and web-based payment services, with mass-market customers paying by hard-copy check significantly less satisfied than those using autopay (800 vs. 851, respectively, on a 1,000-point scale).
Lincoln Automotive Financial Services ranked highest among luxury brands with an 890 score, while Lexus Financial Services (875) ranked second and Acura Financial Services (855) ranked third.
Ford Credit ranked highest among mass market brands with a score of 857. BB&T/RAC (855) ranked second and Honda Financial Services (855) ranked third.
The 2017 U.S. Consumer Financing Satisfaction Study measures overall customer satisfaction in four factors: billing and payment process; onboarding process; phone contact; and website. Satisfaction is calculated on a 1,000-point scale. The study is based on responses from more than 14,500 customers who financed a new- or used-car loan or lease within the past four years and was fielded in July to August 2017.
Originally posted on F&I and Showroom
More Dealer Ops

Dealer Debrief: Defection Data & EV Updates
In this week's debrief, host Lauren Lawrence discusses how to use defection data to your advantage and the latest on EV sales and charging infrastructure.
Read More →
How Defection Data is Bridging the Dealership Conversion Gap
Lead volume is flat, cross-shopping is up and brand loyalty is in retreat. As confident sales teams keep losing buyers they thought they had, daily industry sales data is showing dealers exactly where their funnel is breaking and how to fix it without buying a single new lead.
Read More →
Dealer Debrief: Where are you losing customers?
In this week's debrief, host Lauren Lawrence discusses the hidden leaks in dealerships where you might be losing customers without even realizing it.
Read More →
Dealer Debrief: Improving Your Inventory Management
In this week's debrief, host Lauren Lawrence covers a new survey that shows what service technicians really want and two launches that could help improve your inventory and vehicle life cycle management.
Read More →
Ladies and Gentlemen, This Is a Dealership: Why the Fundamentals Still Decide Who Wins
A teaching moment by a legendary football coach happens to apply perfectly in the auto retail space. Learn what it is and how to use it to your store’s advantage.
Read More →
What Market Timing Mistakes Mean for Your Reinsurance Program
When volatility hits, dealer-owned reinsurance programs face a familiar temptation: pull back and wait for calmer waters. New data from BOK Financial shows why that instinct can quietly cost you years of surplus growth.
Read More →
Dealer Ads and the FTC
The agency has made it clear in recent enforcement actions and warnings, in auto retail and other industries, that advertised prices must include all nonoptional costs to the consumer.
Read More →
Used Autos Supply Dwindles
The March shopping surge, despite high prices, cut into inventory by the most since the thick of the pandemic, Cox Automotive analysts calculated.
Read More →
Managing Risk Effectively Through Changing Times
The variables influencing risk pricing have changed significantly over the past five years. Being proactive and responsive to emerging trends is not optional but essential.
Read More →
Survey Reveals What Won't Fix What's Breaking Car Sales
AutoPayPlus says extra-long auto loans are trapping consumers and threatening the dealer trade-in cycle, and that the industry is leveraging the wrong tools to combat high MSRPs.
Read More →
