auto dealer in black and red logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Toyota's Captive Issues Statement Regarding CFPB, DOJ Allegations

Toyota Motor Credit Corporation issued a statement to F&I and Showroom regarding last week’s regulatory filing. It revealed that the CFPB and the DOJ are alleging that the captive’s practices in the auto finance sector have resulted in the discriminatory pricing of auto loans.

December 1, 2014
3 min to read


TORRANCE, Calif. — Toyota Motor Credit Corp. revealed last week in a regulatory filing that it could face an enforcement action from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the U.S. Department of Justice. According to the Nov. 28 filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the two agencies allege that the captive’s practices have resulted in discriminatory pricing of loans.

In an emailed statement to F&I and Showroom Monday, Toyota’s finance arm said that over the past two and a half years, it has “has activated a stronger, more robust Compliance Management System (CMS)” to help realize its consumer protection and regulatory compliance goals. It also noted that it does not collect consumer data related to race or ethnicity.

“Our intent is that these measures will contribute to a solution that meets the CFPB’s expectations and allows us to better serve our customers,” the statement read, in part. “In the meantime, and in keeping with our commitment to fair and responsible lending practices, it is important for our customers to know that we do not track the race or ethnicity of our customers or credit applicants, and these factors never influence our credit or pricing decisions.”  

The captive said in its filing that it was notified of the potential enforcement action in a Nov. 25 letter issued by the CFPB and DOJ. This notice comes a little more than a year since the captive revealed in a September 2013 filing that the bureau and the DOJ requested information regarding its pricing practices for loans it funds through auto dealers.

The finance source, which Experian Automotive had as the No. 3 finance source in the third quarter with a 4.49% share of the market, said in its recent SEC filing that it intends to cooperate with the agencies’ investigation.

“… We received from the agencies a letter alleging that such practices resulted in discriminatory pricing of loans to certain borrowers in contravention of applicable laws, and informing us that they are prepared to initiate an enforcement proceeding unless we agree to a voluntary resolution satisfactory to them,” the filing read, in part. “The agencies have indicated that they are seeking monetary relief and implementation of changes to our discretionary pricing practices and policies, which … could adversely affect our business.”

Nearly a year ago, the CFPB and DOJ took action against Ally Financial over similar allegations: The finance source was fined $98 million for allegedly engaging in an “ongoing nationwide pattern or practice of discrimination” against African-American, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander borrowers in its auto lending since April 1, 2011.

Starting with a bulletin it issued in March 2013, the CFPB has said lenders will be held responsible for unlawful, discriminatory pricing that is the result of policies that allow dealers to mark up the interest rate on an auto loan in exchange for services rendered. A recent report by the American Financial Services Association, however, found that the bureau’s methodology for determining the presence of discriminatory in auto lending is inherently flawed.

The CFPB declined to comment on the action against Toyota Motor Credit when contacted by F&I and Showroom.

More Compliance

Product & Technologyby StaffFebruary 4, 2026

AAMS Training and Mosaic Compliance Services Merge

The strategic combination is intended to expand technology-driven compliance solutions for the automotive industry.

Read More →
ComplianceOctober 6, 2025

The Jurisprudence of Pricing

Legal concept helps makes sense of California’s recently passed version of the failed federal CARS legislation.

Read More →
Digitalby Hannah MitchellSeptember 5, 2025

Cyber Threats Continue Apace

Hackers, seeing auto retail vulnerabilities in 2024 CDK incident, are taking advantage, data show.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
IndustryJuly 17, 2025

Trump 2.0 and Enforcement Priorities

The upshot is don’t relax, because regulation indeed continues.

Read More →
Blue and white Automotive Service Professionals logo presented over a blue background with various wrench tools.
Complianceby StaffJune 11, 2025

June Is Automotive Service Professionals Month

Observance is opportunity to thank technicians for their crucial role in auto retail.

Read More →
DigitalJune 9, 2025

The Real ID Deadline

Challenges auto dealers may still face verifying identities

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Complianceby StaffApril 28, 2025

Law Firms Tops in Auto Work

They bested all others on value or volume in the first quarter on major deals.

Read More →
Complianceby StaffJanuary 30, 2025

Cox Automotive Releases Compliance Guide

New edition walks auto dealers through relevant regulations for 2025.

Read More →
ComplianceJanuary 1, 2025

Safeguarding Customer Data

Encryption serves a critical role in automotive retail today.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Complianceby StaffDecember 24, 2024

Trump 2.0 and Retail Automotive

Administration’s plans should generally bode well for the industry.

Read More →